What has trump done that is anti gay

Donald Trump has enacted a raft of anti-LGBTQ+ executive orders, many of which specifically target the trans community, just a week in. The White House claims Trump is "supportive of LGBTQ rights.” Here's a list of the actions his administration has taken to roll back those rights. Here's everything from Project that Trump has done so far to target LGBTQ + rights.

Appointing Anti-LGBTQ+ Judges Donald Trump appointed an unprecedented number of judges who hold extreme anti-LGBTQ+ views, and not just on the Supreme Court. These judges will hold their positions for life, threatening decades of regressive and bigoted rulings. Here's what you need to know about President Trump's latest anti-LGBTQ+ executive orders and what they mean for our community.

If they are successful in these efforts, even strong, state-level nondiscrimination protections could be overridden. They are more likely to see the Democratic Party as friendly to these groups. Moreover, the federal government overturning policies enacted by local and state officials can create a clear narrative for the media about a MAGA government ramming through unpopular and extreme policies around which to build political resistance.

In addition, there have been reports that some health care facilities paused providing youth with gender affirming care, fearing that federal funding would be withheld according to this and another Order relating to youth access to gender affirming care see separate entry. Until he speaks. The ACLU is also urging states to strengthen data privacy policies. Prohibiting use of funds to support certain gender affirming care services may make care engagement more challenging for transgender Ryan White clients.

Following the inauguration of Donald Trump in January , we witnessed a sustained, years-long effort to erase protections for LGBTQ people across the entire federal government. Such actions would coerce school districts to discriminate against transgender students and erase the existence of transgender people in the curriculum, causing substantial harm to students in every state. Where politically feasible, the ACLU will be encouraging states to pass their own laws or state constitutional provisions protecting access to gender-affirming health care and even, as noted above, ensuring access to consistent state funding for the care.

If a state mandates coverage for gender affirming care, the state would be required to defray the cost. Legal and policy battles — even those that are unsuccessful in the short run — can serve to frame and focus fights over values in ways that are politically resonant in the long term. Lisa Francois. Below we discuss how the planned policies of a second Trump administration are illegal and unconstitutional under any proper reading of precedent.

In addition to a focus on medical intervention e. The ACLU is laying groundwork to amplify and capitalize on such moments to create political backlash that forces the administration to reconsider. The rule does not mean that plans cannot cover gender affirming care services but excluding certain services from coverage as EHBs means that enrollees would not be assured the same cost-sharing and benefit design protections as for services included in the EHB package.

Throughout this political onslaught, the ACLU, our nationwide affiliate network, and our millions of members have remained stalwart in defense of the basic principle that all people deserve the freedom to be themselves and every state should be a safe place to raise every family. We will continue to challenge efforts to allow the use of religion to discriminate in government programs wherever possible, recognizing that the current Supreme Court has been hostile to our arguments.

Overview of President Trump’s Executive Actions Impacting LGBTQ+ Health | KFF

February 26, An additional federal lawsuit was filed on February 7 th challenging this executive order with a separate temporary restraining order being issued on the 14 th preventing the conditioning of federal funds and also applying to a condition linking gender affirming care to female genital mutilation. Majorities of Democrats see the Supreme Court as unfriendly toward these groups, while a plurality of Republicans see it as neutral.

Under medical guidance, he began puberty blockers to prevent changes that would conflict with his identity. The memo reportedly:. Getting more time was a relief to Cameron who, after starting treatment at 12, remembers feeling "less stressed and a little more hopeful. Since his first term, Trump and his administration have carried out a years-long effort to roll back protections for LGBTQ people.

One of the most extreme positions included in Project is the use of criminal laws to punish gender nonconformity in public life: Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology … has no claim to First Amendment protection … Pornography should be outlawed. In general, LGBTQ adults see these institutions as less friendly to people who are transgender than to people who are gay, lesbian or bisexual.

Directing the HHS Secretary to develop new guidance without this standard, and in accordance with this and other orders, could limit agency ability to identify standards that adequately meet the needs of transgender people. Transgender Survey found they faced higher rates of poverty and homelessness than their cisgender peers, and data from the Human Rights Campaign found a persistent wage gap between transgender and cisgender people.